Current:Home > FinanceIndia implements controversial citizenship law singling out Muslims, drawing accusations of polarization -WealthGrow Network
India implements controversial citizenship law singling out Muslims, drawing accusations of polarization
View
Date:2025-04-14 17:21:14
New Delhi — India's government announced on Monday the implementation of hugely controversial citizenship law that singles out Muslims, four years after it was passed by parliamentarians, and just ahead of general elections in which Prime Minister Narendra Modi is hoping to win a third term. Opponents say the move by Modi and his party is "designed to polarize" India's already divided population ahead of the voting, which takes place in April and May.
The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) paves the way for — specifically — non-Muslims who fled religious persecution in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan and came to India before December 31, 2014, to become Indian citizens.
Muslims singled out by omission
India's Home Minister said in a social media post on Monday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had "delivered on another commitment and realized the promise of the makers of our constitution to the Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians living in those countries."
- U.N. rights chief joins fight against India citizenship law that excludes Muslims
The law does not provide a route to citizenship for people who've fled persecution in non-Muslim majority nations, such as Tamil refugees from Sri Lanka or Rohingya Muslim refugees from Myanmar, of whom there are many thousands in India.
Critics of the law say it violates the secular principles of India's constitution, which prohibits discrimination against citizens on religious grounds.
The ministry said eligible people could apply from Monday for Indian citizenship through an online portal.
The NRC proposal, and proving citizenship
There's fear that Modi's Hindu nationalist government could use the CAA, along with another new measure, to declare Indian Muslims, many of whom are concentrated in eastern states like West Bengal and Assam, illegal immigrants from neighboring Bangladesh if they cannot prove their citizenship.
Many of India's 200 million Muslims fear the citizenship law could be wielded in conjunction with a proposed new National Register of Citizens (NRC) to marginalize or even disown members of the world's third largest Muslim population.
The NRC, which Modi's government has vowed to roll out nationally, would require people to prove their citizenship by showing family documents going back decades. Those who aren't able to produce the required evidence could face detention in camps, and then deportation.
- India closes school after video shows teacher urging students to slap Muslim classmate
About 1.9 million people failed the sudden nationality test when a state-level citizenship registry was rolled out in Assam in 2019, and several hundred were later placed in detention centers, where women have spoken of alleged abuse and inhuman conditions.
The national registry plan is based on the version already in place in Assam.
The CAA will enable many non-Muslims who fail to prove residency under the NRC to regain their citizenship, but it provides no such route to people of the Islamic faith.
"CAA has to be seen along with NRC, the Home Minister has made it very clear," Professor Apoorvanand Jha, an Indian political academic and author, told CBS News. "The larger message to voters is, 'we are going to exclude those who should be weeded out, that's Muslims.'"
Modi's government has denied the citizenship law is anti-Muslim and said it was needed to help religious minorities facing persecution in their Muslim-majority nations. It rejects the argument that the law could be used to take citizenship away from anyone.
Protests and accusations of deliberate polarization
Assam and Kerala states saw protests Monday and Tuesday after the federal government announced the implementation of the CAA. Police and paramilitary troops were deployed there, and in some Muslim-dominated areas of the capital Delhi, which was one of the epicenters of the 2019 protests against the measure.
More than 100 people were killed and thousands injured in clashes between anti-CAA protesters and police across India in 2019 — bringing international attention and, according to some observers, leading the government to hold back implementation of the law until now.
Opposition political parties called Monday's announcement, just before the elections, a bid by Modi's Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) to polarize voters.
"After seeking nine extensions for the notification of the rules, the timing right before the elections is evidently designed to polarize the elections, especially in West Bengal and Assam," Jairam Ramesh, a spokesperson for the opposition Congress party said.
"This is to divide the people, incite communal sentiments and undermine the fundamental principles of the Constitution," Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said in a statement. "This move to stratify Indian citizens who have equal rights, must be opposed unitedly."
"They [BJP] did not succeed in getting public support despite promoting the temple inauguration for over a month… The only way they know is to polarize, and that is what they are doing," social activist Shabnam Hashmi told CBS News.
The government has denied the allegations and said there had been "many misconceptions" about the law. It said implementation was delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic.
- In:
- India
- Immigration
- Islam
veryGood! (3116)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Target's 'early' Black Friday sale is underway: Here's what to know
- Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith Step Out for Dinner in Rare Public Appearance
- Gia Giudice Shares The Best Gen Z-Approved Holiday Gifts Starting at Just $5.29
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Majority Black Louisiana elementary school to shut down amid lawsuits over toxic air exposure
- Volkswagen recalls nearly 115,000 cars for potentially exploding air bag: See list here
- Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Mikey Madison wanted to do sex work 'justice' in 'Anora.' An Oscar could be next.
Ranking
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Majority Black Louisiana elementary school to shut down amid lawsuits over toxic air exposure
- What does it mean to ‘crash out’? A look at the phrase and why it’s rising in popularity
- Diddy, bodyguard sued by man for 1996 physical assault outside New York City club
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Dozen Salisbury University students face assault, hate crime charges after alleged beating
- Liam Payne’s Friend Says He “Never Abandoned” Him After 3 People Are Charged in Connection to Case
- New York Post journalist Martha Stewart declared dead claps back in fiery column: 'So petty and abusive'
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Where things stand with college football conference championship game tiebreakers
Beyoncé is the leading nominee for 2025 Grammys with 11 nods, becoming most nominated ever
Taylor Swift could win her fifth album of the year Grammy: All her 2025 nominations
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
New York, several other states won't accept bets on Mike Tyson-Jake Paul fight
Teachers in 2 Massachusetts school districts go on strike
A new 'Star Wars' trilogy is in the works: Here's what we know